Request to 'Government Advisor on Antisemitism'

Request to 'Government Advisor on Antisemitism':


Good afternoon,

Please could you respond to my questions as raised earlier in December on Twitter.

I have 'longformed' them below, for easier comprehension, and expanded on some of the shortened questions with examples.

Yours sincerely,

Illinois Cook

1.

What is antisemitism? please define.

2. What is 'growth' of prejudice? - Define and prove growth.

3. What is the role of an advisor on AS?

4. Why is the role 'with' / announced by/ assigned to, created by , paid for by 1 particular political party only, the right wing Conservative Party? [Is that the reason why you never seem to mention AS on, by or from the right, or the Conservative Party's position on AS allies, donors, foreign governments? Why has Labour instituted strict procedures vs AS for its membership, but other parties have not, and have not insisted their members sign up to them anyway? In what ways could the creation of the role be described as linked, other than in terms of timing, to 2019, or to your decision on whether to stand for re-election, rather than any other year, and in what way could it be described as being linked to the fake Labour AS 'crisis' gingered up online by eg. actors including Cohen, Berger etc. as shown in Chris Friel's 'MuralGaga' research, available online, or now in the several documents detailing the smear? - cf 'Bad News for Labour', 'Antisemitism and the Labour Party' - ed J Stern-Weiner. Define your view on the Labour Party and AS, and on the relationship Zionism has with the right of politics and the AS advisor's view on / relationship with Zionism, please comment on the Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) view that Zionism is racism and of eg. Mandela, Pappe's and Kasrils' views on Apartheid in Israel, the meaning of Apartheid to you, and the comparison of this with the terms 'racism', and AS. Please comment on Left wing Jewish People who support Palestine and who support Boycotting the Apartheid Israeli regime being commonly labelled AS, and on studies which find AS to be less prevalent on the left and on media relationship to stories of AS including Advisor's view on 'smearing' vs 'evidence' and news selection and other news and presentation bias claims re various main stream media including BBC, and the evidence that was presented by the media during the last few years, the numbers and data relating to people who have been prosecuted for hate speech using current legal system for AS, also the reason for and justification for, the word 'Independent' in your full title, as given today on twitter at least, and the reason you have an @parliament email address] 5. The 'Advisor' role clearly, judging by your tweets, includes 'instigating' an investigation/investigating? Please define investigations which your role as an advisor includes instigating, and reporting systems, funding, regulation, hierarchy or connection to other reports / regulations / bodies / crimes / the courts / enforcement etc.

6. What are your full powers? [I have not heard of an AS prosecutor, or judge, or enforcement, I am only aware of hate crime laws and dodgy libel cases in which celebs or fake and discredited AS orgs like CAA or lawyers like Mark Lewis attempt to out-buy actual anti-racists to leave them with court bills, cf Greenstein, Silver, Heybroek. [what overlap, if any, does the role have with EHRC, the IHRA definition with examples, press and social media companies' own rules on user conduct, the defamation law cf.

The Defamation Act 2013, the 'honest opinion' defence, the 'fair comment' defence. What action if any will you be taking against these and other smearers for their cheapening of AS in order to 'take down' (cf Shai Masot conspiracy) members of the left, who oppose rightwing elements who support the Israeli state and those who oppose Israeli Apartheid or support Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions vs the Israeli state.]

7. What qualifications do you have for the role? [Did others apply? Did you play a role against South African Apartheid or other racism or AS previously? - Please describe ]

8. [Define antisemitism in terms of prejudice and racism and actions and private speech and public tweets], and please discuss how I could measure my own prejudices, with regard to human beings.

9. Please talk about your own prejudices, how they could affect the role?

John Mann

@LordJohnMann

·

Dec 13

I can this morning announce that as government advisor on antisemitism that I will be instigating an investigation this January into the role of the Canary and other websites in the growth of antisemitism in the United Kingdom. https://twitter.com/supergutman/status/1205296902301990912

illinois cook 

@illi4141

·

Dec 13

Replying to

@LordJohnMann

What is Antisemitism? what is growth of prejudice? Prove growth. What is the role of an advisor on AS? Y is role with 1 political party? Adv. includes instigating an investigatn/investigating? What r your powers? What qualifications?Measure my prejudice. Tlk about your prejudices

  

John Mann

@LordJohnMann

·

Dec 31

Not a civil servant and you don’t pay my salary. But all questions welcome. You can email mannjl@Parliament.uk or you can write a letter.



Update: There has been no proper response, only this :

Illinois Cook <illi41g@gmail.com>	Tue, 31 Dec 2019, 17:15
to Lord, bcc: Chris, bcc: michael, bcc: info, bcc: psc, bcc: me

Yes, so in the new year, perhaps I could get a proper response?

There's nothing in Hansard except one sentence in the Jenrick Statement, and some contributions previous which have no relevance to my questions on your role. 

We have agreed so far that such info should be available, and this could not purely of course be so on the basis of me trapesing round the country asking you a question at every meeting with no prepared info for you to hand over for scrutiny as you must agree?

A full result would most preferably take the form of the info i have asked for to be provided online for public scrutiny, or if it doesn't exist yet, to be provided to myself or the public, and then myself or any interested party being able to ask questions about it. Without having to travel would surely be a more modern and ethical solution at that stage also.

Yours sincerely,

Illi Cook

On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, 16:41 MANN OF HOLBECK MOOR, Lord, <mannjl@parliament.uk> wrote:

Looks like you will need to attend one of the numerous public events - averaging one a week and I suggest you search Hansard for all the detail you want- it’s fully accessible to you.

Happy New Year

John

  

Updated 28 May 2020, no further response from Tsar Mann. Total Fraud.

Further to my 'BBC communication' post in May 2010 re BBC Bias / impartiality, which I updated today

Fri, 16 Nov 2018, 13:08

Dear Mr Cook

Thanks for contacting the BBC. This is to confirm we’ve received the attached complaint sent in this name. We’ve included the text of the complaint and a case reference for your records (see below).

Please don’t reply to this email because it’s an automated acknowledgement sent from an account which can’t receive replies. If you do need to get in touch, please use our webform instead at www.bbc.co.uk/complaints, quoting your reference number.

We’ll normally include the text below in our overnight report to producers and management of all the complaints and other reaction we receive today (with your personal details removed). This means it will reach the right people by tomorrow morning.

We’ll do our best to reply as soon as we can, but the time needed depends on the nature of your complaint. If we can’t reply as soon as we’d like (usually within 10 working days) we’ll let you know. For full details of our complaints process please visit: http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/handle-complaint/.

Here are the details of your complaint:----------

YOUR COMPLAINT:Complaint Summary: Antisemitism Smear vs Corbyn

Full Complaint: Obvious outrageous bias to allow this slanderous smear.
----------Thank you again for contacting us,BBC Complaints Team
www.bbc.co.uk/complaintsPlease note: this email is sent from an unmonitored address so please don’t reply. If necessary please contact us through our webform (please include your case reference number).

bbc_complaints_website@bbc.co.uk <bbc_complaints_website@bbc.co.uk>	Tue, 20 Nov 2018, 16:56
to me Tue, 20 Nov 2018, 16:56

Dear Mr Cook
Thank you for contacting us with your concerns about the edition of Question Time from Milford Haven.

We have received a range of feedback about this edition. To allow us to reply promptly to your concerns, and to ensure we use our Licence fee resources as efficiently as possible, we’re addressing here a range of issues which viewers have raised. Our complaints process allows us to offer a consolidated reply like this when necessary. We’re sorry that we can’t reply personally to you on each point which has been made. Please be assured that your reaction has been accurately shared with the programme makers, as well as senior staff.

The comments from Claire Perry MP regarding the Labour leader provoked a strong, mixed reaction from the studio audience. David Dimbleby controlled the situation by bringing her back to the point she was asked about, and asked her to make it in full. David then ensured that Barry Gardiner MP, a close ally of Mr Corbyn, was given an equally clear opportunity to challenge the comments. Mr Gardiner addressed the ‘very personal’ remarks about Jeremy Corbyn as he wished, and in full.

David Dimbleby had already reminded the panellists on a number of occasions to allow other people to speak, both from the audience and elsewhere within the panel. Mrs Perry was not the only panellist to be reprimanded by David – his approach treats each guest appropriately and without bias. We feel that he chaired the discussion professionally and reasonably in a lively and passionate setting.

Your reaction has been shared with the programme team and senior staff across BBC Politics.

Kind Regards

BBC Complaints Team
www.bbc.co.uk/complaints

NB This is sent from an outgoing account only which is not monitored. You cannot reply to this email address but if necessary please contact us via our webform quoting any case number we provided.

We've got your number Israel

Continued quoting of Israeli apologists for ethnic cleansing, murder, terror, torture, vile persecution, racism, apartheid, hate crime, attempting to erase / change history, theft, greed, in the midst of any news item about the region, is a pain to endure.

Today 9th July 2010, on the Guardian website, this: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jul/09/foreign-office-blog-lebanon-hezbollah-fadlallah

A shame that Britain feels the need for such action, still lapdogging it up to the US and Israel.

Luckily for Guardian readers, the background and pedigree of the Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman quoted is cleared up rather quickly. For a start, he is of course clearly a supporter of ethnic cleansing, murder, terror, torture, vile persecution, racism, apartheid, hate crime, attempting to erase / change history, theft, greed, simply by virtue of being a member of the Israeli government today.

This is because we have your number, Israel, and we know the truth about everything, Zionism, 1948 and all the outrages since, how it works and why you currently exist. Witness Walt and Mearsheimer, Finkelstein, Pappe, to name but 3. It's over, everybody knows you're hanging on to your stinking money just as long as you can, you just keep pretending you're not an evil empire.

But further, from this story: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/16/world/middleeast/16mideast.html?pagewanted=2

Mr Palmor's own casual attitude to value of life and peace can be determined: "Yigal Palmor, an Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman, went further, saying that most of the United Nations agency’s staff in Gaza were local Palestinians and alleging that a “large part are affiliated one way or another with Hamas.” "

Mr Palmor's weak attempt to deceive on the nature of the Gaza blockade and the Freedom flotilla on his own webpage: http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/HumanitarianAid/Palestinians/MFA_Spokesman_Gaza_flotilla_24-May-2010.htm From which:

"MFA Spokesman Yigal Palmor

Ships forcing their way into Gaza will do nothing to aid the people there. Existing land crossings are more than capable of meeting their needs.

International aid organizations and the private sector of Gaza ensure that all the necessary food, medicine and clothing are provided to the Strip via Israel. In a typical week, 15,000 tons of supplies enter Gaza. Truckloads of meat, poultry, fish, dairy products, fruits, vegetables, milk powder, baby food, wheat and other staples arrive in Gaza on a daily basis. Building materials are also shipped in, when monitored by International organization so as not to be commandeered by Hamas for the fortification of bunkers.

Since the ceasefire in January 2009, well over a million tons of humanitarian supplies entered Gaza from Israel - that is almost a ton of aid for each man, woman and child in the Strip.The land crossings remain the most efficient system to transfer goods to Gaza, and the flotilla organizers are well aware of this fact. The organizers also know that since December 2008, their ships have been denied permission to land. Israel has invited the organizers of the flotilla to use the land crossings, in the same manner as all the reputable international organizations.

However, they are less interested in bringing in aid than in promoting their radical agenda, playing into the hands of Hamas provocations. While they have wrapped themselves in a humanitarian cloak, they are engaging in political propaganda and not in pro-Palestinian aid. If the organizers were truly interesting in providing humanitarian aid - as opposed to engaging in publicity stunts - they would use the proper channels to ensure delivery of any supplies."

For corrective and to judge Palmor's value as an educated commentator, the above should be read against the UN , WHO and others evaluation of the blockade, summarised here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7545636.stm

The flotilla of course succeeded in achieving a slight relaxation in the list of items banned from entering, described by the UN as a step forward: http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE65G26520100617

"Richard Miron, spokesman for United Nations Middle East envoy Robert Serry, said they were encouraged by Israel's move, adding, "we hope that today's decision by the security cabinet is a real step forward towards meeting the needs in Gaza."The United States, Israel's main backer, said the decision was a positive step but welcomed further loosening. "

So it seems Mr Palmor's judgement of the efficacy of the flotilla or the need for supplies to be increased is somewhat the minority view.

But wait a moment! At the end of the Guardian article, he admits that Frances Guy is an honourable woman!

Re-reading the quotes, it's clear to me that evidence points to the fact that Palmor actually supports her views on Fadlallah, and just at the end of the interview, is actually changing his mind, and has decided that Fadlallah was a man of peace indeed!

Yes you are right Sir!

Practically anyone who opposes your murderous state is a person of peace indeed! Congratulations! A wonderful thing when a man takes the righteous path.

Please contact me when the reparations are finalised. One trillion Euros, to be shared out equally and handed personally to every Palestinian, by an Israeli supporter accused of crimes against humanity, immediate return of refugees to refurbished lands and homes, one man one vote, and the cutting of current Israel into two halves should do it.